A Tale of Toronto

In its Scorecard on Prosperity – 2010, Board of Trade’s study ‘Toronto as a Global City’ continues its examination of Toronto’s economic development, benchmarking Toronto against 23 other great metropolitan areas around the world.

Founded in 1845, the Toronto Board of Trade is Canada’s largest local chamber of commerce, representing 10,000 members. It connects more than 200,000 business professionals and influencers throughout the Toronto region. BoT plays a vital role in elevating the quality of life and global competitiveness of Canada’s largest urban centre.

The board updated data and included new indicators, allowing it to offer an enhanced picture of Toronto’s performance, including a new analysis of Toronto’s relative attractiveness for capital investment. In this way, providing a more comprehensive picture of how Toronto is doing compared to other world-class cities around the globe. The study used a scorecard of 34 indicators grouped into two domains of Economy and Labour Attractiveness. Overall, Toronto ranked 4^th, which is the same as last year.

In my opinion, considering the high net migration into the Greater Toronto Area each year, resulting mainly from immigration, we could have done far better as a city. How can a city attract the world’s best and brightest people and still produce only average economic results? Well, the answer is simple. The world’s best and brightest people are not put to their highest and best use. Qualified professionals are prevented from entering into their professions and forced to drive taxis or work in call centres to support themselves and their families. Only a handful have enough resources or piggy back on their relatives for sustenance, while they struggle full time for years to get a mere foot hold in their profession. After such long struggle, most of this already small group, loose the drive, relevance and creativity that they brought over with them. No wonder Toronto’s poor performance in innovation and productivity growth is troubling, even though these two forces are the major drivers of future prosperity.

The Scorecard on Prosperity introduces the “Capital Lens”: a combination of eight of the Economy domain indicators most closely linked to capital attractiveness (including productivity, venture capital and office rents). The purpose of the capital lens is as an indicator of a metropolitan area’s capacity to attract capital investment — a key determinant of economic prosperity. Despite Toronto’s relative affordability as a place to do business, it falls short when it comes to attracting significant capital investment. Boston ranks first in this category based on outstanding levels of venture capital investment, boosted by the availability of affordable office rents that are better than Toronto’s and a reasonable tax burden.

Toronto has proven itself an attractive place to live, drawing in enough well-educated, skilled newcomers to keep it near the top of the labour attractiveness domain. Toronto leads the pack in its share of high-tech and professional workers and remains competitive in its share of the population with university degrees. Within an easy day’s drive of the populous North-eastern and Midwestern US, Toronto has the market size to generate good investment opportunities and sustain solid productivity growth. With its relatively low business taxes and office rents, Toronto is affordable on the global stage as well.

Toronto is number 10 on the list for Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - $42,538, with Paris leading the pack in GDP category - $79,681. In GDP growth, we rank 14^th. Five-year average annual percentage growth in total employment puts Toronto’s five-year average of 2% at 7^th place, ahead of every US metro area.

Residential building permit growth indicates the rate of investment activity in the residential sector. As an important sector of the economy, housing is a proxy for confidence in the growth of the metro region. The percentage increase in the number of residential building permits is calculated for the five-year period from 2003–08. Toronto, which had negative growth (-0.9%) in the five-year period, is placed 9^th, behind Seattle (1), Montreal (3), Vancouver (4) and Calgary (8). Perhaps building more houses would have met the demand for housing and thus controlled the upward spiral of prices in Toronto’s real estate market.

Toronto’s most pronounced weakness is its lengthy commuting time. Citing under-investment in transit as one of the reasons, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) warned in a recent report that congestion in Toronto is costing the Canadian economy over $5 billion a year. A personal observation: Diversity brings diverse driving habits. The commute time problem is compounded by lack of enforcing progressive driving habits. To make our roads safer, the only way known to Greater Toronto’s traffic policy makers and traffic enforcement agencies seems to be reducing speed. This only adds to the commute times. The focus should be on sharing the road and making traffic efficient.

Overall, Toronto is a world class city and a great place to live or invest in. After Montreal, Toronto’s crime rate is lowest in North America (measured by average number of homicides per 100,000 people). It is economically, socially and culturally vibrant. The city fosters an environment conducive to promote powerful collaborations among businesses, government, technology leaders and community builders. Globally, Toronto plays a vital role in elevating the quality of life and global competitiveness of Canada.

Opinion regarding "Why doesn't Century 21 want more people viewing its real estate listings?"

Cliff Peskin's has written about "Why doesn't Century 21 want more people viewing its real estate listings?" and about Century 21 suing Rogers Communications Inc regarding over its website Zoocasa (source: Financial Post).

Listing data by REALTORS® is up loaded on MLS® system directly through their regional boards. MLS®, which is a trademark, thus enables members of the public to see the information protected under strict data integrity guidelines. Century 21 REALTORS, like other licensed REALTORS, are part of this trademark. Any business would and should protect its trademarks - wouldn't you?

The writer's claim that CREA and Century 21 have an "iron like grip...thereby any individual looking to purchase a home must go through them" doesn't hold much ground. If one reviews the flow of any real estate transaction, the answer to this will become obvious. Once the Seller has retained a REALTOR® to exclusively protect its rights, then no matter where the buyer sees the information about the house, the buyer has to come through the REALTOR® representing the Seller. This is for the protection of the Sellers since REALTORS® are professionals safeguarding the Seller interests.

There is strong possibility that by scraping and aggregation of the listing data, a loss of control occurs and the information might be misquoted or misrepresented, thereby putting the Seller’s interest at risk. Moreover, isn't the data on MLS aggregated anyways? Why is there a need for scraping it and aggregating it again, other than that the company doing so wants to scrape some advertising dollars from such websites. That is my opinion. – Jagdeep Singh is a Century 21 REALTOR® and the Team Leader of the Residential Club at Century 21 New Star Realty Inc., a flourishing Brokerage based in Toronto.

The Federal Budget 2009 and REALTORS®

2009 Canadian Federal Budget is out. Announced by the Federal Conservatives and Stephen Harper’s minority government, we have all seen what the “Budget Fallout” has been. From the New Foundland Premier’s comments about Prime Minister Stephen Harper, to the official opposition Liberal party leader Michael Ignatieff’s press briefing and to NDP leader Jack Layton’s allegation of Harper and Ignatieff’s “new coalition”.

But what does the Federal Budget mean for the REALTORS® and the Canadian real estate consumer.

It could be said that the lobbying efforts of REALTORS® have achieved significant victories. In particular, the expanding the RRSP Homebuyers’ Plan to make it more useful for homebuyers is a significant step forward. The federal budget proposes to increase the withdrawal limit for first-time homebuyers using the Homebuyers Plan from $20,000 to $25,000 (per individual). Under this program, first-time homebuyers are allowed to withdraw funds from their RRSP, tax-free, to put towards the down payment on a home. Amounts withdrawn under the Home Buyer’s Plan must be repaid over a 15-year period, starting the second year following the year of the withdrawal.

Since 1992, an estimated 2 million Canadians have used the Home Buyers’ Plan to purchase approximately 900,000 homes, making this program a huge success. Unfortunately, as time has passed, the usefulness of this program eroded because withdrawal limits were not adjusted.

Under the first time home buyer’s tax credit, the Budget proposes a 15 per cent credit that would be applied to a $5,000 amount, and would provide up to $750 in tax relief to reduce costs associated with first home purchases. This will assist the first-time home buyers with the costs related to the purchase of a home such as legal fees, land transfer taxes, etc. An individual will be considered a first-time home buyer if neither the individual nor the individual’s spouse or common-law partner owned and lived in another home in the calendar year of the home purchase or in any of the four preceding calendar years.

The Budget also proposes a 15 per cent Home Renovation Tax Credit, to be claimed on the portion of eligible home renovation expenditures exceeding $1,000, but not more than $10,000, meaning that the maximum tax credit that can be received is $1,350. This will apply to eligible home renovation expenditures for work performed, or goods acquired, after January 27, 2009 and before February 1, 2010, pursuant to agreements entered into after January 27, 2009. Credit can be claimed on eligible expenditures incurred on one or more of an individual’s eligible dwellings, including houses, cottages, and condominium units owned for personal use.

Renovation costs for projects such as finishing a basement or re-modelling a kitchen will be eligible for the credit, along with associated expenses such as building permits, professional services, equipment rentals and incidental expenses. Routine repairs and maintenance will not qualify for the credit. Nor will the cost of purchasing furniture, appliances, audio-visual electronics or construction equipment.

Additional information on the Home Renovation Tax Credit will soon be available on Canada Revenue Agency’s website at www.cra-arc.gc.ca

All of this will of course only become a reality if the budget passes the vote in the House of Commons. Let’s see how it unfolds.

Money Laundering and Real Estate - My take on it

It is believed that criminals will find ways to conduct their activities no matter what. But I am a strong believer that we shouldn't make it easy for them. New law requires real estate agents to verify ID of buyers and sellers and track deposits. This is an excellent enhancement to existing procedures. Simply because, apart from other things, it enables you to know your client better. New federal laws and regulations dealing with money laundering and anti-terrorist financing went into effect on June 23rd, 2008. These require real estate agents and brokers to collect and verify more personal information from buyers and sellers. Real estate agents must also now track the source of funds received during the course of a real estate transaction, such as the deposit.

These new regulations are part of federal legislation (Bill C-25) passed in 2007 that requires a number of industries, including real estate, to do more to help stop money laundering and terrorist financing. The regulations are enforced by the federal agency known as the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada, or FINTRAC.

Real estate agents are now required to ask for proof of the identity of all buyers or sellers involved in a Canadian real estate transaction. If the client is a corporation, that information must include corporate documentation, and the names of the corporation directors. They must also ascertain if a third party is involved in the transaction.

The following scenarios in a real estate transaction are of particular concern.

1. Client arrives at a real estate closing with a significant amount of cash.
2. Client purchases property in the name of a nominee such as an associate or a relative.
3. Client does not want to put his/her name on any documents that would connect him/ her with the property or uses different names on offers, closing documents and deposit receipts.
4. Client inadequately explains the last minute substitution of the purchasing party’s name.
5. Client negotiates a purchase for market value or above asking price, but records a lower value on documents, paying the difference “under the table”.
6. Client sells property below market value with an additional “under the table” payment.
7. Client pays initial deposit with a cheque from a third party, other than a spouse or a parent.
8. Client pays substantial down payment in cash and balance is financed by an unusual source or offshore bank.
9. Client purchases personal use property under corporate veil when this type of transaction is inconsistent with the ordinary business of the client.
10. Client purchases property without inspecting it.
11. Client purchases multiple properties in a short time period, and seems to have few concerns about the location, condition, and anticipated repair costs, etc of each property.
12. Client pays rent or the amount of a lease in advance using a large amount of cash.
13. Client is known to have paid large remodeling or home improvement invoices with cash.
14. Client does not want correspondence sent to home address.
15. Client over-justifies or over-explains the transaction.
16. Client’s home or business telephone number has been disconnected or there is no such number.
17. Client uses a post office box or general delivery address

Will this legislation and procedures be effective in stopping money laundering? In my opinion, it will certainly make a dent. What do you think?